USPTO Registered Patent Agent/Attorney Needed – Software Non-Provisional Review & Filing

@revival786

Greetings! I can represent you before the USPTO as a registered patent practitioner and act as practitioner of record for your foreign-domiciled filing. I will independently review your complete package, cross-check the non-provisional against the provisional, and strengthen or revise the specification and claims as needed, focusing on Section 101 subject-matter eligibility, Section 112 support and enablement, claim scope and structure, provisional priority, possible new matter, inventorship, and overall prosecution strategy. I will separately assess the technical appendix additions for disclosure support, priority, and inventorship, and determine how or whether to incorporate them. For the drawings, I will recommend changes and implement corrections needed for a proper filing, and address targeted prior-art or patent research where it improves the claims or strategy. The final deliverable will be a professionally reviewed, filing-ready application with the necessary USPTO documents, electronically filed through Patent Center, including the official filing acknowledgement or receipt. I offer a fixed fee for review, revision, and filing, and I will provide my full name and USPTO registration number for independent verification. Thanks, Revival

@AdvocacyZone

Hello, I am an Advocate with experience in intellectual property, legal research, contract review, and legal drafting. I can review the existing software patent package, assess the specification, claims, drawings, provisional support, §101/§112 issues, inventorship, and potential new matter, and provide detailed revisions and filing recommendations. However, I am not a USPTO-registered patent attorney or patent agent, so I cannot represent the applicant before the USPTO or file as practitioner of record. If you require substantive legal review and preparation of the application package for a USPTO-registered practitioner to file, I can assist efficiently on a fixed-fee basis. Faizan Akram, Advocate HC, PK.

@qudsiab4

Hello, I am interested in reviewing, strengthening, and filing your already-prepared U.S. non-provisional utility patent application. I understand this is not a from-scratch drafting project. I can carefully review the specification, claims, drawings, provisional application, technical appendix, and practitioner memo, with particular attention to §101 eligibility, §112 support and enablement, claim scope, priority, new matter, inventorship, and prosecution strategy. I can also recommend or implement necessary drawing corrections and conduct targeted prior-art research where useful. I can work on a fixed-fee basis and handle the USPTO filing requirements through Patent Center, including the necessary filing documents and electronic filing receipt. I would be happy to review the complete package and confirm the scope and fixed fee before proceeding.

@venplura

Hi there! The real risk here isn't the review itself—it's that a rushed practitioner might miss how your provisional application actually constrains your non-provisional claims, especially with software inventions where scope creep and new matter issues hide easily in technical appendices. I'd approach this by treating the provisional as a legal boundary, not just reference material. That means mapping every claim element back to specific provisional disclosure, then stress-testing your proposed additions against that map before they go into the specification. For software patents, this prevents the classic problem where you've genuinely invented something clever but can't claim it because the provisional didn't actually enable or anticipate it. I'm a registered patent attorney with software prosecution experience. Happy to discuss your timeline and any specific claim areas you're most concerned about. Corné

@raeesc9

Hello, I have more than 10 years of experience in the field of Contracts, online services terms/policies, privacy laws, corporate and intellectual property issues. I provided the next services: - Contract Drafting---- SaaS, Service / Agent / Investment Agreements. IT Legal Services------ End-user License Agreements, Website terms of use/service/conditions, Online agreements/disclaimers, Software Development Agreements, Privacy (include GDPR/CCPA), Intellectual Property issues------ Trademark Registration, Patent Filing, Corporate Issues------ Corporate Agreements, Shareholders Agreement, Legal Research------ Crypto, Corporate, regulations etc. I love my clients and I always try to do more than necessary. Hire me if you want the best result. Regards

@ansariandrehman

Hello, I have immense experience of providing legal process outsourcing services to the persons. LITIGATION LEGAL ASSISTANT AND PARALEGAL SERVICES at fraction of Attorney cost in: 1. Legal Research 2. Intellectual Property and Copyrights 2. Family Law: Divorce & Child Custody/Support/Termination of Parental Rights 3. Home Loan Bank MERS Foreclosure Litigation 4. Commercial and Residential Evictions, Motions 5. Bankruptcy Petition Preparer, filing and litigation 7. Civil & Personal Injury Complaint/Answers/Motions/Discovery I prefer fixed price for your assignment. I believe I have the experience to match your expectations. Looking forward to work with you. Regards

@sourishr2

I am a practicing advocate with 4 years of legal drafting and research experience. I can provide dedicated filing support for your software non-provisional patent application, including document review, legal and prior-art research support, claim and specification formatting, preparing filing documents, organizing USPTO submission materials, and checking the application for completeness. I understand that USPTO representation must be handled by a registered patent attorney or agent, and I can work under their direction to ensure the filing package is accurate and properly organized.

@Drmonahagras

As a highly experienced consultant physician and undergraduate law major from the University of London, I bring a unique blend of medical and legal expertise to the table. My extensive clinical resume perfectly aligns with your project's needs for meticulous review and analysis of complex records, assessment of breach of duty and causation, and identification of potential areas of negligence. My practice spans internationally, showcasing my adaptability and willingness to undertake remote instructions. The skills I have honed over the years align with your requirements for a thorough substantive practitioner review. My capabilities in legal research have helped me identify both potential adversarial evidence as well as supportive clinical evidence. This skill is transferable to targeted patent or prior-art research that may help improve the claims or prosecution strategy for your application. Understanding that cost efficiency is paramount for a bootstrapped startup founder like yourself, I offer a practical value proposition with my fixed-fee engagement structure. I am ready to dive into your application, cross-checking it against the provisional and diligently reviewing it for §101 subject-matter eligibility, §112 support and enablement, claim scope and structure, provisional priority support, possible new matter, inventorship, and overall prosecution strategy. The outcome will be a professionally reviewed