Bubble.io Security Audit for SaaS

@Tanmoy236

Good day! A pre-launch security audit for a legal SaaS needs controlled, read-only testing that exposes real risks without altering production configuration. I’ll systematically assess Bubble’s security boundaries, tenant isolation, access controls, and exposed resources using only approved test accounts and non-sensitive data. My approach: Privacy Rules → auth/RBAC → tenant isolation → URL/ID manipulation → backend/API exposure → private media → QR/unique links → Stripe plan limits → data-loss/scalability risks → severity-based report → Critical/Important verification. I’m a Top 1% Verified Freelancer with 9+ years of experience and 450+ completed projects, with hands-on experience auditing web apps, APIs, authentication, access controls, and SaaS security. Can you provide the Bubble test accounts and required access after NDA confirmation?

@TheSecondSource

Hey! We are a team of 62 professionals specializing in application security, with 9+ years auditing SaaS platforms, authentication flows, APIs, and data-access controls. Here’s how we can help: * Audit Bubble Privacy Rules and database access controls * Test authentication, authorization, and cross-tenant isolation * Check APIs, file access, URLs, Stripe limits, and exposure * Deliver prioritized findings with clear remediation guidance Could you clarify whether the current Bubble app has separate user roles, and are the Stripe plans already enforcing case or subscription limits?

@mughiraaa

hi, i can handle the pre launch security audit for recordlex with a focused review of the areas you listed. i’ll check bubble privacy rules, authentication, user and tenant isolation, id and url manipulation, backend exposure, file access, qr links, and stripe plan and case limits. i’ll test everything using controlled accounts and non sensitive data without making any changes unless you approve them. you’ll get a clear report with critical, important and recommended findings, including impact and practical fixes. i can complete the audit within your 3 to 5 business day window and include the post fix verification for critical and important issues. i’m happy to work with the agreed two milestone setup. we can have a quick call to confirm access and testing scope before starting.

@vijaydogra03

Hello, I understand the scope and constraints: read-only testing against controlled test accounts, no configuration changes without approval, and a written report structured by severity with remediation guidance, within your $750/two-milestone structure. My approach: for Bubble specifically, most real vulnerabilities live in Privacy Rules misconfiguration, data types left with overly permissive default rules, or rules that look correct but don't actually constrain what's returned via API/data source calls. I'll test cross-user/tenant isolation directly, attempting to access another test account's exhibits, cases, or files through UI navigation and direct URL/ID manipulation, since sequential or guessable IDs are a common Bubble weak point. For backend/API exposure, I'll check whether Bubble's Data API or workflow endpoints are reachable without proper auth scoping, and whether private video/audio files are genuinely access-controlled or just unlinked-but-reachable. I'll also test public QR/unique-link boundaries for leakage beyond intended single-resource scope. For Stripe, I'll verify plan/case-limit enforcement can't be bypassed through workflow timing or subscription-state edge cases. Deliverable: a report with Critical/Important/Recommended findings, impact, remediation guidance, plus the included post-fix verification round. Comfortable with the NDA and fixed price/milestone structure. Best regards, Vijay Kumar Dogra

@mikes126

settings. The important part is testing whether a user can cross tenant boundaries, access protected files/data, bypass plan restrictions, or reach backend functionality they shouldn’t. I’d work through controlled test accounts and cover: Bubble Privacy Rules and database access Authentication, authorization, and cross-user/tenant isolation URL/ID manipulation and insecure direct object access Backend workflows and API exposure Private video/audio file access QR codes and unique-link access boundaries Stripe subscription, plan, and case-limit enforcement Basic data-loss, performance, and scalability risks I’ll document each finding with severity, affected area, reproduction evidence, impact, and practical remediation guidance. I’ll make no configuration or workflow changes without your approval. The two-milestone / $750 structure and 3–5 business-day delivery work for me. I can also perform the included post-fix verification for Critical and Important findings.

@onjoutone

You want to know, before RecordLEX goes live, whether one tenant can reach another tenant's exhibits — Privacy Rules, IDs in URLs, private media links, QR boundaries and Stripe plan limits — and you want that in a report a law firm or auditor can read. How I work: testing starts only after written authorisation and proof the target is yours, with a one-page scope (test accounts, endpoints, out-of-bounds items, time window). No configuration, workflow, Privacy Rule or Stripe change is touched without your written approval — I test and document, you approve every fix. Within 5 business days you receive: every finding rated Critical / Important / Recommended, with evidence (request/response, screenshots, hashed so it is tamper-evident), reproduction steps and concrete remediation; a short executive summary; and one round of post-fix verification for Critical and Important findings. I run a production Node.js/MongoDB payment platform myself and pen-tested it end to end this year — webhook signature bypass, secret rotation, headers, vulnerable dependencies, all closed — so I test cross-user access and subscription/plan gating the way an operator thinks, not just a scanner. Two questions: - Will you provide two test accounts on separate tenants plus one admin-level account, or URL-only access? - Is there a staging copy, or does testing run against production?

@SuspiciusRacoon

In Bubble, security lives in Privacy Rules, and their common failure is not a missing rule but one checking a field empty for records created before it existed, or created by a workflow running as admin that bypasses it. I check every data type against every access path, not just what the front end exposes. Four things specific to a legal exhibit platform: Tenant isolation on nested data. A case belongs to a firm, an exhibit belongs to a case. If Exhibit's rule only checks its own fields, not the parent case's firm, changing a case ID in the URL can expose another firm's exhibits. Public QR/unique-link access is the highest-risk surface: it works without login, so any rule gap is reachable by anyone with the link. I test whether scope widens by incrementing adjacent unique IDs. Private video/audio files can be reachable by direct URL even when the parent record's rule is correct, since file URLs and record rules are not always the same boundary. I verify the file URL, not just the displaying page. Stripe plan/case-limit enforcement: a client-side or UI-only check is bypassable via direct calls to Bubble's backend workflows, the exposure point in your scope. Report: each finding with severity, the exact record/URL to reproduce it, and the specific rule or workflow fix, not a generic recommendation. 25 years in infrastructure, Certified Ethical Hacker, 500+ audits under NDA between 2003 and 2018. Your terms, timeline and two-milestone payment work as stated.

@braing2

Bubble apps leak in predictable places, and your scope names most of them. What matters most for a legal-exhibit product: Privacy Rules are the only real server-side control — anything a rule lets through can be pulled with a dev-tools search regardless of what the page shows, so I test every data type as a second tenant, a logged-out user and a stale session, not just through the UI. Then files: Bubble's S3 uploads are public by URL unless "make this file private" is set and attached correctly, so private video and audio get tested by direct URL from another account. Then in order — backend workflows and the Data/Workflow API exposed without auth; unique-ID and URL-parameter swaps across cases; QR and unique-link pages, checking what's loaded beyond what's rendered; Stripe plan and case-limit checks living in front-end conditions that can be bypassed; and data-loss and performance risks at scale. Test accounts only, non-sensitive data, nothing changed without your written go-ahead; I log what I test and how so you can retrace it. Report: Critical / Important / Recommended, each with reproduction steps, impact, and the fix in Bubble terms — which rule, which setting. Post-fix verification of Critical and Important included. Within 24 hours of access you get a first note on the Privacy Rules of your three core data types, so you see the depth before the second milestone.

@malvinop

saya memiliki kemampuan berfoto, balas chat, video dan menggambar dan skill marketing dalam penawaran ini saya ajukan semoga menjadi keuntungan bagi semua yang di libatkan

@AIMsytems

Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst by Cisco Networking Academy, bringing a security-first approach to RecordLEX. The audit will focus on proving that access controls and tenant boundaries withstand deliberate manipulation, not just reviewing Bubble settings. • Controlled security testing using dedicated accounts and non-sensitive data • No Bubble, database, workflow, or Stripe changes without prior approval • Authentication and session security testing • Authorization/RBAC and privilege-escalation tests • Multi-tenant isolation and IDOR/BOLA testing • URL/ID manipulation, enumeration and direct-object access • Bubble Privacy Rules and database exposure review • Backend workflows, APIs and authorization testing • Private video/audio file and direct-URL access testing • QR/unique-link access, reuse and enumeration testing • Stripe subscription, plan and case-limit enforcement • Data-loss, exposure, abuse and basic scalability checks • Regression testing to reproduce and verify vulnerabilities Deliverables: • Professional security audit report • Test coverage and confirmed findings • Prioritized remediation guidance • One post-fix verification round for Critical/Important findings Delivery: 3–5 business days Fixed price: $750 Milestones: $375 — Audit & Testing $375 — Report & Verification The result will be a clear, evidence-based security baseline before RecordLEX goes live.

@salimt09

Hi, Your audit scope closely matches my current focus in web application security, particularly Broken Access Control, IDOR, authorization testing, and cross-user / cross-tenant isolation. For RecordLEX, I would structure the assessment around: * Bubble Privacy Rules and database access controls * Horizontal and vertical authorization testing * Cross-user and cross-tenant isolation * URL / record ID manipulation and IDOR * Backend workflows and API exposure * Private video, audio, and file access * Public QR and unique-link authorization boundaries * Stripe plan, subscription, and case-limit enforcement * Basic data-loss and application security risks Testing would be performed only with the authorized test accounts and non-sensitive test data you provide. I would not modify workflows, database records, Privacy Rules, or Stripe configuration outside of the agreed testing actions. The final report would include reproducible findings, severity, security impact, evidence, and practical remediation guidance, followed by the included verification of Critical and Important fixes. I can work within the stated 3–5 business-day delivery window and the $750 fixed project budget. Best regards, Salim

@jeandres7

I HAVE RECENTLY FINISHED A SIMILAR PROJECT involving a comprehensive security audit for a SaaS platform, focusing on database security and user authentication. This experience has given me a solid understanding of the critical aspects you’re looking to address for RecordLEX. I recognize that ensuring robust cross-user isolation and secure access controls is essential for your legal exhibit-management platform. Your emphasis on a detailed written report is also noted, as it will help guide future security measures. My approach combines thorough testing with a focus on user-friendly solutions, ensuring no compromise on security while maintaining seamless functionality. I specialize in identifying vulnerabilities and providing actionable remediation guidance, which aligns perfectly with your needs. Let’s discuss how I can ensure RecordLEX is secure and ready for launch. Regards, Jeandre.