Fix TradeStation Volume Indicator

@tangramua

Dear ,   We carefully studied the description of your project and we can confirm that we understand your needs and are also interested in your project. Our team has the necessary resources to start your project as soon as possible and complete it in a very short time.   We are 25 years in this business and our technical specialists have strong experience in C Programming, C# Programming, Software Architecture, Metatrader, Debugging, Software Development, Software Engineering, TradeStation and other technologies relevant to your project.   Please, review our profile https://www.freelancer.com/u/tangramua where you can find detailed information about our company, our portfolio, and the client's recent reviews.   Please contact us via Freelancer Chat to discuss your project in details.    Best regards, Sales department Tangram Canada Inc.     

@Herculesz

Hi, this looks like a state-management bug between TradeStation chart execution and RadarScreen evaluation, not just a bad volume formula, and that kind of drift usually comes from update timing or session-state handling. The real engineering risk is inconsistent event semantics between the two runtimes, where the same intraday logic can produce different values if state resets, tick aggregation, or recalculation triggers are handled differently. I usually structure this kind of fix by first isolating where divergence starts, then tightening the state model so both contexts resolve the same running value. The closest relevant work on my side is NYSE Day Trading Bot Development, where intraday market data consistency mattered, along with Custom Feature Development & Integration, which was about stepping into an existing codebase, reviewing logic, and shipping a clean hand-off. I’d approach this by separating formula correctness from execution-context behavior: verify session resets, running accumulators, and any conditional branches that may evaluate differently in RadarScreen versus the chart. Once the drift point is identified, the refactor is usually straightforward. If useful, I can start by reviewing the indicator source and mapping the likely divergence points before live-market validation. Thanks, Hercules

@Friends4it

Hi, I've read your brief — "Fix TradeStation Volume Indicator". This is squarely our wheelhouse at Global IT Vision: building it cleanly end-to-end with well-structured, tested code and reliable communication. We deliver clean, maintainable work with a smooth handover, and I've posted a couple of scope questions on the board. Could we do a quick call to align on the details? — Muhammad Idrees / Global IT Vision Pvt. Ltd

@ducthodg

Hi,I can start immediately and take the first hour to review the EasyLanguage indicator source and identify where the Chart vs RadarScreen values begin to drift. I have experience debugging TradeStation / EasyLanguage indicators that behave differently between chart studies and RadarScreen columns, especially issues caused by session resets, intrabar updates, tick/volume accumulation, BarStatus logic, CurrentBar handling, data retrieval differences, and variables that may double-count or miss updates in real time. My approach would be: 1. Review the existing EasyLanguage code and clean up any risky volume/session logic. 2. Check whether the script is using the correct update trigger for both Chart and RadarScreen. 3. Compare live Chart plot values against RadarScreen values on the same symbol and interval. 4. Locate the exact point where the numbers diverge. 5. Refactor the indicator so both environments calculate from the same logic and stay synchronized throughout the session. 6. Deliver the corrected .eld file with a short change note. Rate: $10/hour Estimated total: around 4–6 hours, so approximately $40–$60 total. I can keep the first milestone at $10 for the initial code review/debug session, then continue only after confirming the issue and fix path. Please send the EasyLanguage source and I can begin right away.

@swadhinr

I can start immediately to diagnose and resolve the discrepancy between your chart and RadarScreen readings. I’ll perform a detailed review of your EasyLanguage code to identify issues such as tick miscounts, session resets, or update timing differences, then run side-by-side live testing to pinpoint where divergence occurs. Once identified, I’ll refactor the logic to ensure both environments stay perfectly synchronized in real time, delivering a clean, corrected .eld file with a clear explanation of all fixes applied.

@durgesh8527

With over 12 years of experience in software development, my team and I at SUNIL are well-versed in resolving intricate coding issues. Our proficiency in EasyLanguage and dedication to refining trading indicators is what makes us the perfect fit for this project. Our approach will begin with a thorough examination of your existing codebase. We'll review your formulas, data-retrieval calls, and update triggers meticulously for any potential glitches. To ensure complete synchronization between your chart plot and RadarScreen column, we'll conduct side-by-side testing during live market hours. As an added value, once we've successfully rectified the issue, we'll provide a detailed .eld file with precise explanations about the changes implemented. Furthermore, we are readily available to run tests as soon as possible - ensuring that this urgent matter receives prompt attention. Partnering with SUNIL would mean relying on an enterprise-grade team that delivers reliable solutions and ensures consistent support even after project completion. This project is in dire need of our expertise and our commitment is to get it resolved "to the tick" from market open through close without requiring any manual refreshes. Let's discuss how we can bring our tried-and-tested skills to bear on your project – together, we can build a stronger foundation for your trading activities!

@RusianD

Hi there, I'm Ruslan, an experienced software developer with a displayed proficiency in various languages. Given your need for a seasoned EasyLanguage developer to repair your volume indicator, my extensive experience will critically fall into place. Not only am I fully conversant with EasyLanguage but I have an unwavering passion for pinpointing coding discrepancies that could compromise data readings. Throughout this project and beyond, I'll ensure the raw plot on your live chart consistently matches the values your RadarScreen produces. By reviewing and cleaning up the current formulas and update triggers amicably, I'll guarantee no doubling or missing of ticks during sessional runtimes. My ability to pay meticulous attention to detail will prove invaluable here as I perform these tasks. Crucially, my dual understanding of both backend and frontend workings will come in handy during the side-by-side testing. Rest assured that once I complete this project, you will not only be satisfied with the corrected .eld file but also with my concise note on what was changed. Let's move quickly to resolve this discrepancy—my earliest start time is immediately available so we can hit the ground running! With me on board, you're guaranteed a high level of professionalism and efficiency throughout

@mdabdullahallm5

I will quickly step in to audit your EasyLanguage indicator and resolve the mismatch between chart and RadarScreen outputs. By tracing calculation flow, session handling, and update triggers, I’ll identify where discrepancies arise and correct them for precise real-time alignment. I’ll validate the fix during live market conditions and deliver a clean .eld file along with a concise explanation of the adjustments made.

@mobiwebsolutions

✋ Hi There!!! ✋ THE GOAL OF THE PROJECT:- FIX AND SYNCHRONIZE TRADESTATION EASYLANGUAGE VOLUME INDICATOR SO THAT CHART AND RADARSCREEN DISPLAY IDENTICAL REAL TIME INTRADAY VALUES WITHOUT DRIFT I have carefully read the complete project description and understand you need urgent debugging of your EasyLanguage indicator where chart and RadarScreen values are mismatched. I am the best fit for this project because I specialize in trading system debugging, real-time data synchronization, and performance validation. 1. Review and debug EasyLanguage code to identify logic causing tick mismatch or double counting 2. Test live chart vs RadarScreen output to locate exact divergence point 3. Refactor and optimize script to ensure identical real-time volume readings across both platforms I will provide clean corrected EasyLanguage code, full testing during market hours, debugging, and final delivery of the .eld file with explanation of changes. I have 9+ years experience as a full stack developer and have worked on trading indicators and financial data synchronization systems. Looking forward to chat with you for make a deal Best Regards Elisha Mariam

@trm66614

Hey there! I’ll tackle this hour with focused debugging, using C# programming for a lightweight test harness, and apply strong Software Engineering discipline to ensure the fix sticks. I’ll walk through the EasyLanguage code to flag double-counts or missed ticks, then run live tests to see where the drift begins. Next, I’ll refactor the logic so chart and RadarScreen display identical values from open to close. I’ll deliver the corrected .eld file plus a brief note explaining the changes and how to validate quickly during future sessions. This approach minimizes risk and speeds up hand-off, with clear testing steps and documentation. If you’re ready, I can start right away and share test results live as you review. The plan leverages thorough Debugging, C# Programming, and Software Engineering practices to deliver a robust fix and a clean hand-off. What specific session window and data feed should I target first for drift testing (e.g., regular market hours vs. gaps), and do you have a preferred start time for the initial live test?

@revival786

Greetings! I will review your EasyLanguage indicator code, identify why chart and RadarScreen readings differ, refactor for consistent real time values, and deliver the corrected .eld file with a change note. I can start immediately. Send your indicator source. Thanks, Revival

@emilesd617

Hi, I am a tradestation developer with 8 years of rich experience. I am familiar with easylanguage, tradestation, radarScreen, debugging, and c#. For this project, the most important part is to find why the chart and radarScreen calculate different intraday volume values. I can review the current indicator logic, check update triggers and session handling, then refactor it so both sides show the same real-time value. I can also test it during live market hours and provide the corrected .eld file with a short change note. I'm an individual freelancer and can work on any time zone you want. Please contact me with the best time for you to have a quick chat. Looking forward to discussing more details. Thanks. Emile.

@carlosd178

Hello, As a result of a detailed review of your project requirements, I fully understand the scope and expectations. You need an EasyLanguage intraday-volume indicator corrected so the chart and RadarScreen show identical real-time values for the same symbol and interval. I have experience handling similar types of projects and I'm available to start your project right now. I bring strong expertise in EasyLanguage, TradeStation, Debugging, Software Architecture, C#, C Programming, and Trading Indicator Development. One key challenge here is identifying whether the mismatch comes from update triggers, session reset logic, tick/volume accumulation, or RadarScreen-specific calculation behavior. My first step would be to review the existing EasyLanguage code, trace the volume calculation from market open, and check for any double-counting or missed ticks. Then I would test the chart plot and RadarScreen side by side during live market hours, refactor the logic, and deliver the corrected .eld file with a short change note. I have a couple of quick questions. • Does the mismatch start immediately at market open or only after some bars/ticks? • Is the indicator using tick volume, trade volume, or custom intraday accumulation logic? I would be glad to discuss further details and am ready to start immediately. Looking forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Carlos.

@guptakishan805

As a seasoned software developer with over 5 years of experience, I have successfully completed numerous projects similar to what you're presenting here. My expertise in C Programming, Software Architecture, and Development is exceptionally well-aligned with your requirements. These skills combined with my attention to detail and thoroughness will enable me to meticulously weed out any issues that might cause discrepancies in the intraday-volume indicator and fix them expeditiously. One of my biggest strengths is my ability to work productively under pressure without sacrificing the quality of my deliverables. Urgency is something I am accustomed to managing effectively, and so, I am ready to dive right into the code review and cleanup process. Additionally, my willingness to maintain open lines of communication throughout the duration of the project guarantees transparency and ensures that you remain informed at every stage. Given this opportunity, it will be my mission to make certain that your chart plot and RadarScreen column align perfectly from market open till close without manual refreshes. Finally, after implementing the necessary changes, I will provide a comprehensive explanation of what was modified in the .eld file. Let's get started on resolving this pressing issue so you can proceed with your trades confidently!

@rbtech1984

Hi There!!! ★★★★ (Fixing mismatch issue between TradeStation chart and RadarScreen volume indicator in real-time) ★★★★ Project understanding: I understand you need an EasyLanguage expert to debug and fix an intraday volume indicator where chart values and RadarScreen values are not matching. The task includes identifying logic issues, correcting tick handling, and ensuring both outputs stay perfectly synced during live market hours. Services: ⚜ EasyLanguage code audit & debugging ⚜ Volume calculation logic correction ⚜ Chart vs RadarScreen synchronization fix ⚜ Real-time tick handling optimization ⚜ Live market testing & validation ⚜ Refactoring and performance cleanup ⚜ Final .eld file delivery with documentation I have experience working with trading indicators, scripting and debugging real-time data discrepancies, including chart vs scanner mismatches. I understand how TradeStation handles bars, ticks and data feeds, bit expereince in fixing logic errors in indicators also. Plan is to first review your existing code, replicate the mismatch, identify where drift starts, then fix calculation logic and validate in live session until both outputs match exactly tick by tick. I am available to start immediately and can work during live market hours for testing. Warm Regards, Farhin B.

@danielv2801

Hello, Your requirement is very clear. The key objective is to quickly identify why the chart and RadarScreen are producing different intraday volume values, isolate the source of the discrepancy, and ensure both environments remain perfectly synchronized throughout the trading session. I have experience reviewing and debugging EasyLanguage indicators, including issues related to data series handling, intrabar updates, session resets, tick aggregation, and RadarScreen-specific execution differences. My approach would be: • Review the existing EasyLanguage code line by line • Compare chart execution versus RadarScreen execution behavior • Identify any double-counting, missed ticks, or timing inconsistencies • Validate calculations against live market data • Refactor the indicator for consistent real-time results • Perform side-by-side testing until values match from market open to close Deliverables: • Corrected and optimized EasyLanguage code • Updated .ELD file • Brief documentation explaining the root cause and implemented fixes • Verification testing results I can start immediately after receiving the source code and would be available during live market hours for testing and rapid iterations. Looking forward to reviewing the indicator.

@ELGAMLDev

Hi, I’ve worked with EasyLanguage indicators before, and the behavior you’re describing is a known issue when comparing Chart Analysis with RadarScreen. In many cases, the difference comes from how RadarScreen loads historical bars, handles accumulative calculations, or processes real-time updates rather than from the calculation itself. My approach will be to first review the existing EasyLanguage code line by line, paying close attention to session resets, tick accumulation, data retrieval, and update logic. Then I'll compare the indicator output on both the live chart and RadarScreen to identify the exact point where the values begin to diverge. Once the root cause is confirmed, I'll refactor the code so both environments use the same calculation path and remain synchronized tick-by-tick throughout the trading session. After the changes, we'll run live market tests together to verify that the Chart and RadarScreen produce identical values without requiring manual refreshes. Once everything is confirmed, I'll deliver the corrected `.eld` file along with a brief summary of the changes made. I'm available to start as soon as you share the source code.

@tyronet2

Chart and RadarScreen showing different numbers off the same symbol almost always traces back to one of two things: a different update trigger frequency between the two environments (RadarScreen often refreshes on its own cadence, separate from bar-close events the chart uses), or a tick-counting condition that double-fires in one context but not the other. I'd isolate which one it is before changing anything, since fixing the wrong cause just hides the symptom temporarily. My process: review the EasyLanguage source first, specifically looking at how the indicator pulls volume data — Volume() calls, any session-reset logic, and what triggers a recalculation in each environment. RadarScreen and chart plots don't always execute on identical event cycles in TradeStation, so I'd check whether the script assumes one update model while actually running under two different ones simultaneously. Once I've found where the drift starts, I'd refactor so both environments pull from the same calculation path rather than maintaining separate logic branches that can drift independently — that's usually the more durable fix versus patching each symptom as it appears.

@MIndlabsAi6

Hey there! I’m beyond excited to take this on! I recently wrapped up a similar project with good results. Drawing from my experience in C Programming, C# Programming, Software Architecture, Metatrader, Debugging, Software Development, Software Engineering, TradeStation, I’m ready to dive into your project. Please come over chat and discuss your requirement in a detailed way. Regards Vishal Maharaj