Trading Strategy Research & Evaluation – TradingView

@mayr81

You need a TradingView/Pine Script strategy research partner for ES/NQ futures, focused on rule-based entries/exits, non-repainting logic, and reliable post-close signals that can feed alerts + webhook automation. My approach: - Independently shortlist ~5 candidate strategies from public TradingView/Pine sources and reputable literature. - Rigorously sanity-check each candidate for: clearly defined entry/exit rules, Strategy Tester compatibility, reproducible backtests, and absence of lookahead/repainting. - Backtest on Futures (ES/NQ) across meaningful time windows, documenting performance characteristics and key assumptions/limitations. - For each candidate, deliver a structured evaluation including instruments/timeframes, backtest results, alert feasibility, and technical modifications required to make signals deterministic after candle close. Deliverables: - ~5 strategy profiles with: name/source, mechanism, entry/exit logic summary, ES/NQ timeframe coverage, backtest outcomes, limitations, and an explicit assessment of TradingView alert + webhook readiness. - Clear reasoning for why top picks are technically promising and why other candidates are rejected. If you want a fast path, the first set of candidates can be delivered early, followed by deeper validation on the most robust ones.

@prashanpatel557

Hello, I can act as a TradingView/Pine Script strategy research partner, not just a programmer. I have experience evaluating rule-based strategies, Pine Script backtesting, identifying repainting/lookahead issues, and preparing TradingView alerts/webhook-ready systems. I can research and shortlist 5 promising strategies specifically for ES/NQ futures, then independently backtest and evaluate each for robustness rather than simply selecting strategies with attractive historical returns. For each candidate, I’ll provide the strategy logic, timeframe, backtest metrics, assumptions/limitations, repainting analysis, alert/webhook suitability, required modifications, and an overall assessment. My focus will be on reproducibility, realistic execution assumptions, risk-adjusted performance, and avoiding over-optimised results. I can work at €20/hour and provide an initial shortlist/research framework quickly, followed by detailed testing and evaluation.

@mdabdullahallm5

I can act as your strategy research partner, not just a Pine Script developer. I’ll independently research and screen TradingView/public strategies, then rigorously test the strongest ES/NQ candidates for non-repainting behavior, reproducibility, signal quality, and automation readiness. You’ll receive approximately five thoroughly evaluated strategies with backtest results, assumptions, limitations, alert/webhook compatibility, required modifications, and my assessment of each strategy’s potential. I have hands-on experience with Pine Script, Strategy Tester, alerts, webhooks, and automated trading systems.

@ziedb4

Hi, I have hands-on experience building and validating algorithmic trading systems (Pine Script/MQL5, backtesting, futures strategies), and this research task is directly in my wheelhouse. How I'll approach it: Sourcing — Independently research a broad pool of publicly available trading strategies (TradingView community scripts, published research, other credible sources), not limited to one platform. Technical screening — Filter candidates against your criteria: rule-based entry/exit, no repainting or future-data leakage, signals confirmed after candle close, alert/webhook compatibility, and futures-only (ES/NQ). Independent backtesting — Run my own backtests on the surviving candidates rather than trusting the creator's published results, checking for realistic, reproducible performance. Selection & write-up — Narrow to the ~5 strongest candidates, with the full breakdown you requested for each: source, mechanics, instrument/timeframe, backtest results, limitations, TradingView alert/webhook suitability, required technical modifications, and my honest assessment of potential — plus why the others were rejected. I understand this is a technical evaluation to find promising candidates for further testing, not a search for guaranteed profitability, so I'll be transparent about weaknesses, curve-fitting risk, and what still needs validation. I can start immediately and am happy to share my trading-systems background beforehand if useful.

@richard031596

You need someone to research ES/NQ strategies, reject repainting or lookahead logic, and narrow the field to about 5 candidates that are actually suitable for TradingView alerts and webhook automation. My background is stronger on automation, backend workflows, APIs, and webhook-driven systems than on discretionary trading research, so I would approach this as a technical validation exercise: reproducible rules, candle-close signals, no future-data dependency, alert compatibility, webhook readiness, and clear backtest assumptions. I can also document why weaker candidates were rejected instead of only presenting winners. I’d plan roughly 8–12 hours for the research and evaluation phase. Do you want both ES and NQ tested across the same timeframes, or should I prioritize one contract first?

@loxtic

Hello, how are you doing? I have considerable experience with TradingView Pine Script, strategy research, and backtesting, and I’ve worked on automated trading setups with alert/webhook flows for futures-focused testing. I’ve deployed multiple projects that involved evaluating rule-based strategies, assessing repaint risks, and validating backtest reproducibility without relying on future data. I can research and shortlist about 5 solid candidates, summarize how they work, backtest results, limits, and any needed tweaks for alerts and webhooks. Let me know further if interested.

@haseebs74

hi, I read the requirements carefully. This is more of a strategy research and technical evaluation project than simply writing Pine Script, and I can approach it that way. I’ll research and shortlist around 5 promising Futures strategies for ES/NQ, then independently test and evaluate each one for: Clear, rule-based entries/exits Reproducible TradingView backtests Repainting/lookahead/future-data issues Performance after candle close Alert and webhook compatibility Execution assumptions and limitations Robustness rather than simply chasing optimized historical returns For every selected strategy, I’ll provide the source, logic, timeframe, backtest results, assumptions, automation suitability, required modifications, and my reasoning for selecting it. I’ll also explain why other candidates were rejected. My background includes Pine Script, TradingView, backtesting, APIs, automation, and webhook-based workflows, so I can evaluate both the strategy itself and whether it can realistically be automated. I understand that profitability is not guaranteed and will focus on finding technically sound candidates worth further research. I’m available to start immediately. Thanks, Haseeb

@jtmerch

Hello, You need someone who can vet strategies for structural soundness, not just pull backtest screenshots off TradingView and call it research. I'll pull candidates from public and community sources, screen each for repainting, lookahead bias, and alert-after-close reliability, then backtest the survivors on ES/NQ with realistic fill assumptions. Every rejected candidate gets a short written reason so you understand the filtering logic, not just the shortlist. I can start with a quick screen of 15-20 candidates this week and show you the filtering criteria before committing to full backtests. Thanks

@AnchelHuman

INTRO I've recently helped a client navigate the tricky waters of automated trading strategies, leading them to high-quality options that fit their needs perfectly. I can assist you in identifying and evaluating promising trading strategies that meet your criteria for TradingView alerts and webhooks. MIDDLE Your focus on strategies with clear, rule-based conditions and reliable signals really resonates with me. I understand the importance of avoiding repainting and ensuring robust backtest results for futures. I specialize in trading strategy research and evaluation, backed by extensive experience with TradingView and Pine Script. My analytical skills will ensure you receive well-rounded candidates. OUTRO Let's chat about how we can refine your strategy selection process and find those hidden gems together. Kind Regards, Anchel.

@shariqueshaikh18

As an automation and trading expert, I believe my Pine Script proficiency coupled with proficiency in TradingView strategy tester and trading strategy development makes me the ideal candidate for your project. My unique specializations not only include building automated trading systems but also full-stack software development that runs smoothly even when you're away from the screen. My previous work includes developing MQL4/MQL5 Expert Advisors with a particular emphasis on dynamic risk management and producing clean backtest reports, skills that align perfectly with your project.

@BoltIQ

As a company with extensive experience in algorithmic trading, trading automation, and quantitative research, we are the perfect fit for this project. We specialize in building and optimizing systematic trading solutions, like the one you're seeking. Our skills extend to TradingView and Pine Script, which are crucial for this project. In addition to our technical capability with Trading Strategy Research and Backtesting on TradingView, we’re skilled in identifying any repainting or lookahead problems which could impact a strategy's efficiency. We are well-versed in the nuances of automating trades via TradingView alerts and webhooks and have a demonstrated understanding of the technical limitations that automated TradingView strategies can present. We take a data-driven and risk-first approach to strategy development and evaluation. This aligns perfectly with your requirement for strategies that are technically sound, robust, and promising but no fraudulent optimization of history.

@Maxxionn

Hi , You need an expert in TradingView, Financial Markets, Pine Script and Backtesting, and I have a tailor-made solution ready for you. Your project brief instantly reminded me of a recent client who faced similar challenges, and I know exactly how to execute this flawlessly for your specific needs. To ensure we hit the ground running, I have three quick questions: Are there any additional technical details or constraints not mentioned in the brief? What is the primary hurdle currently blocking your progress on this? What is your strict timeline for completion? Why trust me with your project? The Record: 250+ Projects. 6+ Years. 100+ consecutive 5-star reviews. The Standard: Zero misses. I don’t just finish the job; I guarantee flawless execution. The Availability: Full-time freelancer, online 9 AM - 9 PM EST. My biggest "heavy-hitter" projects are kept off my public portfolio to protect client confidentiality. Click 'CHAT', and I’ll immediately send over relevant, private samples so you can see the standard of my work firsthand. Best regards, Muhammad Arsalan

@Jennycreation

Hello sir, I have 17 year experience in stock trading Strategy. I already built trading view pine script for Forex market in this we implement many indicator and complex strategy. in pine script we also set alert for live trading using webbook Api. so our pine script do automation trading. I already work on mt5 and mt4 EA system also. where we build many strategy based on many indicator and already work on Forex Crypto Copy trading strategy So I have 17 year of experience in trading industry with below 1 Trading view Pine Script Strategy Development 2 MT5 and Mt4 Expert Development 3 Automation Trading using Python 4 Copy Trading System 5 Cryptocurrency trading system Let me know if my experience fit on your project. we can more discuss project on Chat. Please inbox me. Thanks

@richardb063

Hi, I’ll focus on researching and validating non-repainting Pine Script strategies for ES and NQ using TradingView Strategy Tester. Finding around five technically sound strategies that can produce reproducible candle-close signals and support alerts/webhooks is the goal. I’ve worked on projects where TradingView, Pine Script, backtesting, repainting checks, alerts, and webhook automation needed careful validation before any strategy was considered automation-ready. I’ll compare candidates on logic clarity, robustness, backtest behavior, execution assumptions, and automation suitability, and I’ll explain why weaker candidates were rejected. I’d like to win this project and I’m confident I can deliver a clear, evidence-based shortlist within the agreed deadline if awarded. Thanks.

@BaileyG07

Hello! Finding robust trading strategies for automated trading is a critical task, and I can help you identify high-quality candidates tailored to your specific needs. My approach involves thorough research across TradingView and other reliable sources to pinpoint strategies that meet all your technical criteria. With extensive experience in TradingView, Pine Script, and backtesting, I can evaluate potential strategies for their rule-based entry and exit conditions, reproducibility of results, and suitability for automated alerts. I’ll ensure that each candidate is robust and technically sound, avoiding pitfalls like repainting and future data reliance. You can expect clear communication throughout the process, including detailed assessments of each strategy's performance and limitations. I can get started immediately and look forward to discussing your project further. What specific criteria or preferences do you have for the strategies?

@Santoshgangwar5

Hi, I can help with this as a structured trading-strategy research and technical evaluation project rather than simply collecting popular TradingView scripts. I would evaluate candidate strategies against the criteria you specified, including rule-based entries/exits, non-repainting behaviour, lookahead/future-data risks, reproducible backtesting, candle-close signal confirmation, TradingView alerts and webhook suitability. For ES/NQ futures, I would independently test the selected candidates and document the assumptions, timeframe, execution model and limitations so the results are not presented as artificially optimized performance. For each of the approximately five final candidates, I can provide: • Strategy/source and concise explanation • Instruments and timeframe • Independent backtest results • Entry/exit and execution assumptions • Repainting/lookahead assessment • TradingView alert compatibility • Webhook automation suitability • Required technical modifications • Strengths, weaknesses and limitations • Overall assessment of whether it deserves further development I will also document why other candidates were rejected rather than selecting strategies purely because they show attractive historical returns. My approach would prioritize robustness and technical suitability for future automation over headline backtest performance. **Rate: €18/hour** **Initial estimate: approximately 20 hours** **Availability: I can start immediately.**

@Aswinbharathim

Hi, This is a strong match for my background. I work with Pine Script, Python backtesting, and futures/prop-firm risk systems. My approach would be to screen candidate strategies for the things that usually make public TradingView results misleading: repainting, lookahead bias, unrealistic execution assumptions, and poor reproducibility. For each candidate, I can document: • Source and strategy rules • Whether the logic is reproducible and non-repainting • Backtest assumptions and limitations • Where the strategy is likely to break down • Whether TradingView alerts/webhook automation is technically viable I also have existing Pine Script work involving configurable drawdown and risk mechanics, which I can use as technical portfolio proof if useful. I suggest starting with a clearly defined initial block of work so you can evaluate the quality before extending the research. My rate is $15/hour. Happy to begin with the first candidates immediately.