Nathanael J.

I'm rating this project with very mixed feelings. Looking coldly and objectively at the bottom line performance of the project, it was horrible: drastic changes in the implementation framework agreed upon (including switching to using a third-party package for the core of the project), huge delays to the original deadline (increased due to relying on the third party to modify its pack age), and a final deliverable built from outdated sources with various problems (with at least two very serious flaws existing even in the final sources). All of these cost me x10 more time on this project than expected and get only a partly satisfactory deliverable. Under normal circumstances I'd give this a 'horrible' rating. However, Nathanael was committed enough to completing the project that he even spent a couple hundred $ of his own money for getting third-party help, without even requesting/demanding additional funds. He also seems like very technically capable, and I admit that I would like to work with him again in the future. Therefore I am only giving an 'average' rating.